Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 3 authors, 2018-07-10

Re: INFO: rcu detected stall in llcp_sock_sendmsg

From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Date: 2018-07-10 10:56:01
Also in: linux-wireless, lkml

On Mon 2018-07-09 14:05:08, Eric Dumazet wrote:

On 07/09/2018 01:50 PM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 10:34 PM, syzbot
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hello,

syzbot found the following crash on:

HEAD commit:    1e4b044d2251 Linux 4.18-rc4
git tree:       upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1414c2c2400000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=25856fac4e580aa7
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e9f364d3b15ce41d8451
compiler:       gcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180413 (experimental)

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this crash yet.

IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+e9f364d3b15ce41d8451@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Looks like the problem is actually in nfc, so +nfc maintainers.
Note this issue was discussed before, maybe we should patch NFC without waiting for nfc maintainer.
Do you have any particular solution in mind, please? See below.
----------------------------------------------------

On 06/25/2018 10:12 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
quoted
On (06/26/18 07:07), Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
[..]
quoted
quoted
 #include <net/nfc/nfc.h>
@@ -755,7 +756,8 @@ int nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(struct nfc_llcp_sock *sock, u8 ssap, u8 dsap,
                pdu = nfc_alloc_send_skb(sock->dev, &sock->sk, MSG_DONTWAIT,
                                         frag_len + LLCP_HEADER_SIZE, &err);
                if (pdu == NULL) {
-                       pr_err("Could not allocate PDU\n");
+                       pr_err_ratelimited("Could not allocate PDU\n");
+                       cond_resched();
                        continue;
                }

But this thread is still in an infinite (unkillable?) loop? If yes, we
are waiting for the next syzbot report 
The loop is still infinite, correct, but we have a preemption point now.
Sure, net people can come with a much better solution, I'll be happy to
scratch my patch.
This can not be the right solution, think about current thread being real time,
cond_resched() might be a nop.

We should probably not loop at all, or not use MSG_DONTWAIT.
These two solutions look promising. But they both need to
get reviewed by someone familiar with the code.

On one hand, nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame() already returns some errors
before sending anything. But I am not sure how to deal with situation
when a fragment of the message has already been sent.

Best Regards,
Petr
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help