Re: [PATCH mlx5-next] RDMA/mlx5: Don't use cached IRQ affinity mask
From: Max Gurtovoy <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-17 09:18:25
Also in:
linux-rdma
On 7/16/2018 8:08 PM, Steve Wise wrote:
Hey Max:
Hey,
On 7/16/2018 11:46 AM, Max Gurtovoy wrote:quoted
On 7/16/2018 5:59 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:quoted
quoted
Hi, I've tested this patch and seems problematic at this moment.Problematic how? what are you seeing?Connection failures and same error Steve saw: [Mon Jul 16 16:19:11 2018] nvme nvme0: Connect command failed, error wo/DNR bit: -16402 [Mon Jul 16 16:19:11 2018] nvme nvme0: failed to connect queue: 2 ret=-18quoted
quoted
maybe this is because of the bug that Steve mentioned in the NVMe mailing list. Sagi mentioned that we should fix it in the NVMe/RDMA initiator and I'll run his suggestion as well.Is your device irq affinity linear?When it's linear and the balancer is stopped the patch works.quoted
quoted
BTW, when I run the blk_mq_map_queues it works for every irq affinity.But its probably not aligned to the device vector affinity.but I guess it's better in some cases. I've checked the situation before Leon's patch and set all the vetcors to CPU 0. In this case (I think that this was the initial report by Steve), we use the affinity_hint (Israel's and Saeed's patches were we use dev->priv.irq_info[vector].mask) and it worked fine. Steve, Can you share your configuration (kernel, HCA, affinity map, connect command, lscpu) ? I want to repro it in my lab.- linux-4.18-rc1 + the nvme/nvmet inline_data_size patches + patches to enable ib_get_vector_affinity() in cxgb4 + sagi's patch + leon's mlx5 patch so I can change the affinity via procfs.
ohh, now I understand that you where complaining regarding the affinity change reflection to mlx5_ib_get_vector_affinity and not regarding the failures on connecting while the affinity overlaps (that is working good before Leon's patch). So this is a known issue since we used a static hint that never changes from dev->priv.irq_info[vector].mask. IMO we must fulfil the user wish to connect to N queues and not reduce it because of affinity overlaps. So in order to push Leon's patch we must also fix the blk_mq_rdma_map_queues to do a best effort mapping according the affinity and map the rest in naive way (in that way we will *always* map all the queues). -Max.