Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 4 authors, 2018-06-27

Re: [PATCH rdma-next 08/12] overflow.h: Add arithmetic shift helper

From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2018-06-27 18:44:29
Also in: linux-rdma, lkml

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Jason Gunthorpe [off-list ref] wrote:
Leon? Seems like agreement, Can you work with this version?

#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <assert.h>

#define u64 uint64_t

/*
 * Compute *d = (a << s)
 *
 * Returns true if '*d' cannot hold the result or 'a << s' doesn't make sense.
 * - 'a << s' causes bits to be lost when stored in d
 * - 's' is garbage (eg negative) or so large that a << s is guarenteed to be 0
 * - 'a' is negative
 * - 'a << s' sets the sign bit, if any, in '*d'
 * *d is not defined if false is returned.
 */
#define check_shift_overflow(a, s, d)                                          \
        ({                                                                     \
                typeof(a) _a = a;                                              \
                typeof(s) _s = s;                                              \
                typeof(d) _d = d;                                              \
                u64 _a_full = _a;                                              \
                unsigned int _to_shift =                                       \
                        _s >= 0 && _s < 8 * sizeof(*d) ? _s : 0;               \
                                                                               \
                *_d = (_a_full << _to_shift);                                  \
                                                                               \
                (_to_shift != _s || *_d < 0 || _a < 0 ||                       \
                 (*_d >> _to_shift) != a);                                     \
        })

int main(int argc, const char *argv[])
{
        int32_t s32;
        uint32_t u32;

        assert(check_shift_overflow(1, 0, &s32) == false && s32 == (1 << 0));
        assert(check_shift_overflow(1, 1, &s32) == false && s32 == (1 << 1));
        assert(check_shift_overflow(1, 30, &s32) == false && s32 == (1 << 30));
        assert(check_shift_overflow(1, 31, &s32) == true);
        assert(check_shift_overflow(1, 32, &s32) == true);
        assert(check_shift_overflow(-1, 1, &s32) == true);
        assert(check_shift_overflow(-1, 0, &s32) == true);

        assert(check_shift_overflow(1, 0, &u32) == false && u32 == (1 << 0));
        assert(check_shift_overflow(1, 1, &u32) == false && u32 == (1 << 1));
        assert(check_shift_overflow(1, 30, &u32) == false && u32 == (1 << 30));
        assert(check_shift_overflow(1, 31, &u32) == false && u32 == (1UL << 31));
        assert(check_shift_overflow(1, 32, &u32) == true);
        assert(check_shift_overflow(-1, 1, &u32) == true);
        assert(check_shift_overflow(-1, 0, &u32) == true);

        assert(check_shift_overflow(0xFFFFFFFF, 0, &u32) == false && u32 == (0xFFFFFFFFUL << 0));
        assert(check_shift_overflow(0xFFFFFFFF, 1, &u32) == true);
        assert(check_shift_overflow(0xFFFFFFFF, 0, &s32) == true);
        assert(check_shift_overflow(0xFFFFFFFF, 1, &s32) == true);
}
Oh yes, please include these tests in lib/test_overflow.c too! Nice. :)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help