On 06/22/2018 01:20 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Garry McNulty <redacted>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 21:14:27 +0100
quoted
br_port_get_rtnl() can return NULL if the network device is not a bridge
port (IFF_BRIDGE_PORT flag not set). br_port_slave_changelink() and
br_port_fill_slave_info() callbacks dereference this pointer without
checking. Currently this is not a problem because slave devices always
set this flag. Add null check in case these conditions ever changye.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID 1339613 ("Dereference null return value")
Signed-off-by: Garry McNulty <redacted>
I don't think this is reasonable.
The bridge code will never, ever, install a slave that doesn't have
that bit set. It's the most fundamental aspect of how these objects
are managed.
+1
This keeps coming up, here's the previous one:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/896046/
Please do a more thorough check if these conditions can actually occur.
In this case, as Dave said, they cannot.
To be explicit as with the patch I mentioned above:
Nacked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov [off-list ref]
You can find more info in my reply to the patch above.
Thanks,
Nik