2 messages, 2 authors, 2018-06-15 · open the first message on its own page
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Date: 2018-06-15 02:07:47
Matthew,
Removing the percpu_ida code nets over 400 lines of removal. It's not as spectacular as deleting an entire architecture, but it's still a worthy reduction in lines of code.
Since most of the changes are in scsi or target, should I take this series through my tree? -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Date: 2018-06-15 02:37:38
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 10:06:58PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
Matthew,quoted
Removing the percpu_ida code nets over 400 lines of removal. It's not as spectacular as deleting an entire architecture, but it's still a worthy reduction in lines of code.Since most of the changes are in scsi or target, should I take this series through my tree?
I'd welcome that. Nick seems to be inactive as target maintainer; his tree on kernel.org hasn't seen any updates in five months. Thanks!