Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use sbitmap instead of percpu_ida
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Date: 2018-06-15 02:07:47
Also in:
kvm, linux-scsi, lkml, target-devel, virtualization
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2018-06-19 · Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use sbitmap instead of percpu_ida · "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
- 2018-06-15 · Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use sbitmap instead of percpu_ida · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
- 2018-06-12 · Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use sbitmap instead of percpu_ida · Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
- 2018-06-12 · Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use sbitmap instead of percpu_ida · Bart Van Assche <hidden>
- 2018-06-12 · [PATCH 0/3] Use sbitmap instead of percpu_ida · Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Matthew,
Removing the percpu_ida code nets over 400 lines of removal. It's not as spectacular as deleting an entire architecture, but it's still a worthy reduction in lines of code.
Since most of the changes are in scsi or target, should I take this series through my tree? -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering