Thread (12 messages) read the whole thread 12 messages, 2 authors, 2018-06-21

Re: [net RFC] net/mlx4_en: Use frag stride in crossing page boundary condition

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2018-06-20 00:25:22


On 06/19/2018 11:05 AM, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
this is only true for XDP setup, for non XDP max stride_size can only
be around ~3k and only for mtu > ~6k

For XDP setup you suggested:
-               priv->frag_info[0].frag_size = eff_mtu;
+               priv->frag_info[0].frag_size = PAGE_SIZE;

currently the condition is:

release = frags->page_offset + frag_info->frag_size > PAGE_SIZE;

so my solution and yours have the same problem you described above.

the problem is not with the initial values or with stride/farg size
math, it just that in XDP we shouldn't reuse at ALL. I agree with you
that we need to optimize and maybe for PAGE_SIZE > 8k we need to allow
XDP setup to reuses. but for now there is a data corruption to handle.

Sure, we all agree there is a bug to fix.

The way you are fixing it is kind of illogical.

The NIC can use a frag if its _size_ is big enough to receive the frame.

The _stride_  is an abstraction created by the driver to report an estimation of the _truesize_,
or memory consumption, so that linux can better track overall memory usage.

For example, if MTU=1500, the size of the fragment is 1536 bytes, but since we can put only
2 fragments per 4KB page (on x86), we declare the _stride_ to be 2048 bytes.

Declaring that a final blob of a page, being 1600 bytes, not able to receive a frame because
_stride_ is 2048 is illogical and waste resources.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help