Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] net: phy: improve PHY suspend/resume
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Date: 2018-06-05 19:39:45
On 02.06.2018 22:27, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
On 01.06.2018 02:10, Andrew Lunn wrote:quoted
quoted
Configuring the different WoL options isn't handled by writing to the PHY registers but by writing to chip / MAC registers. Therefore phy_suspend() isn't able to figure out whether WoL is enabled or not. Only the parent has the full picture.Hi Heiner I think you need to look at your different runtime PM domains. If i understand the code right, you runtime suspend if there is no link. But for this to work correctly, your PHY needs to keep working. You also cannot assume all accesses to the PHY go via the MAC. Some calls will go direct to the PHY, and they can trigger MDIO bus accesses. So i think you need two runtime PM domains. MAC and MDIO bus. Maybe just the pll? An MDIO bus is a device, so it can have its on PM callbacks. It is not clear what you need to resume in order to make MDIO work.Thanks for your comments! The actual problem is quite small: I get an error at MDIO suspend, the PHY however is suspended later by the driver's suspend callback anyway. Because the problem is small I'm somewhat reluctant to consider bigger changes like introducing different PM domains. Primary reason for the error is that the network chip is in PCI D3hot at that moment. In addition to that for some of the chips supported by the driver also MDIO-relevant PLL's might be disabled. By the way: When checking PM handling for PHY/MDIO I stumbled across something that can be improved IMO, I'll send a patch for your review.
I experimented a little and with adding Runtime PM to MDIO bus and PHY device I can make it work: PHY runtime-resumes before entering suspend and resumes its parent (MDIO bus) which then resumes its parent (PCI device). However this needs quite some code and is hard to read / understand w/o reading through this mail thread. And in general I still have doubts this is the right way. Let's consider the following scenario: A network driver configures WoL in its suspend callback (incl. setting the device to wakeup-enabled). The suspend callback of the PHY is called before this and therefore has no clue that WoL will be configured a little later, with the consequence that it will do an unsolicited power-down. The network driver then has to detect this and power-up the PHY again. This doesn't seem to make much sense and still my best idea is to establish a mechanism that a device can state: I orchestrate PM of my children. Heiner
quoted
It might also help if you do the phy_connect in .ndo_open and disconnect in .ndo_stop. This is a common pattern in drivers. But some also do it is probe and remove.Thanks for the hint. I will move phy_connect_direct accordingly.quoted
AndrewHeiner