On Thu, 31 May 2018, Dan Carpenter wrote:

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 05:07:15PM -0400, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:

quoted

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 04:09:16PM +0100, Colin King wrote:

quoted

From: Colin Ian King <redacted>

The assignment dev = dev is redundant and should be removed.

Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1469486 ("Evaluation order violation")

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <redacted>

Applied, Thanks.

Please use [PATCH bpf-next] in the subject next time.
See Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst

Guys, be reasonable...

git log --author=Carpenter | \
	grep -A1 "Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter [off-list ref]" | \
	grep -v Carpenter | grep Signed | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u | wc -l

I have sent patches to 206 maintainers.  It doesn't scale for everyone
to have their own special document for sending patches.

Thanks Dan, I support this point of view completely.  Special information
has to be in one place and in a machine readable manner.  Maybe
get_maintainers can produce this information in some way, if it is
essential.

julia

I asked this last time, and I even skimmed your document, but how are
people supposed to go from linux-next to the correct bpf-next git tree?
It's a pain for me to do this for net, but net is way larger and busier
than any other tree.  I know it's a bit rude for me to say that you guys
are not as important as net, but that's how I feel.  I'm only going to
report bugs instead of writing patches if you guys are going to insist
on all sorts of new rules.

regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html