On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 08:20:16AM +0200, Christophe LEROY wrote:
Le 23/05/2018 à 20:34, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
quoted
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 08:57:01AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
quoted
+_GLOBAL(csum_ipv6_magic)
+ lwz r8, 0(r3)
+ lwz r9, 4(r3)
+ lwz r10, 8(r3)
+ lwz r11, 12(r3)
+ addc r0, r5, r6
+ adde r0, r0, r7
+ adde r0, r0, r8
+ adde r0, r0, r9
+ adde r0, r0, r10
+ adde r0, r0, r11
+ lwz r8, 0(r4)
+ lwz r9, 4(r4)
+ lwz r10, 8(r4)
+ lwz r11, 12(r4)
+ adde r0, r0, r8
+ adde r0, r0, r9
+ adde r0, r0, r10
+ adde r0, r0, r11
+ addze r0, r0
+ rotlwi r3, r0, 16
+ add r3, r0, r3
+ not r3, r3
+ rlwinm r3, r3, 16, 16, 31
+ blr
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(csum_ipv6_magic)
Clustering the loads and carry insns together is pretty much the worst you
can do on most 32-bit CPUs.
Oh, really ? __csum_partial is written that way too.
I thought I told you about this before? Maybe not.
Right, now I tried interleaving the lwz and adde. I get no improvment at
all on a 885, but I get a 15% improvment on a 8321.
It won't likely help on single-issue cores (like the one 885 has), yes.
Segher