[PATCH net-next 01/14] nfp: return -EOPNOTSUPP from .ndo_get_phys_port_name for VFs
From: Jakub Kicinski <hidden>
Date: 2018-05-26 04:55:26
Subsystem:
netronome ethernet drivers, networking drivers, the rest · Maintainers:
Andrew Lunn, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds
After recent change we started returning 0 from ndo_get_phys_port_name for VFs. The name parameter for ndo_get_phys_port_name is not initialized by the stack so this can lead to a crash. We should have kept returning -EOPNOTSUPP in the first place. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <redacted> --- drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c
index eea11e881bf5..1f572896d1ee 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c@@ -3286,11 +3286,12 @@ nfp_net_get_phys_port_name(struct net_device *netdev, char *name, size_t len) if (nn->port) return nfp_port_get_phys_port_name(netdev, name, len); - if (!nn->dp.is_vf) { - n = snprintf(name, len, "%d", nn->id); - if (n >= len) - return -EINVAL; - } + if (nn->dp.is_vf) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + + n = snprintf(name, len, "%d", nn->id); + if (n >= len) + return -EINVAL; return 0; }
--
2.17.0