Re: [PATCH net] ipv4: fix fnhe usage by non-cached routes
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Date: 2018-05-03 05:33:05
Hello, On Wed, 2 May 2018, David Ahern wrote:
On 5/2/18 12:41 AM, Julian Anastasov wrote:quoted
Allow some non-cached routes to use non-expired fnhe: 1. ip_del_fnhe: moved above and now called by find_exception. The 4.5+ commit deed49df7390 expires fnhe only when caching routes. Change that to: 1.1. use fnhe for non-cached local output routes, with the help from (2) 1.2. allow __mkroute_input to detect expired fnhe (outdated fnhe_gw, for example) when do_cache is false, eg. when itag!=0 for unicast destinations. 2. __mkroute_output: keep fi to allow local routes with orig_oif != 0 to use fnhe info even when the new route will not be cached into fnhe. After commit 839da4d98960 ("net: ipv4: set orig_oif based on fib result for local traffic") it means all local routes will be affected because they are not cached. This change is used to solve a PMTU problem with IPVS (and probably Netfilter DNAT) setups that redirect local clients from target local IP (local route to Virtual IP) to new remote IP target, eg. IPVS TUN real server. Loopback has 64K MTU and we need to create fnhe on the local route that will keep the reduced PMTU for the Virtual IP. Without this change fnhe_pmtu is updated from ICMP but never exposed to non-cached local routes. This includes routes with flowi4_oif!=0 for 4.6+ and with flowi4_oif=any for 4.14+).Can you add a test case to tools/testing/selftests/net/pmtu.sh to cover this situation?
Sure, I'll give it a try.
quoted
@@ -1310,8 +1340,14 @@ static struct fib_nh_exception *find_exception(struct fib_nh *nh, __be32 daddr) for (fnhe = rcu_dereference(hash[hval].chain); fnhe; fnhe = rcu_dereference(fnhe->fnhe_next)) { - if (fnhe->fnhe_daddr == daddr) + if (fnhe->fnhe_daddr == daddr) { + if (fnhe->fnhe_expires && + time_after(jiffies, fnhe->fnhe_expires)) { + ip_del_fnhe(nh, daddr);I'm surprised this is done in the fast path vs gc time. (the existing code does as well; your change is only moving the call to make the input and output paths the same) The change looks correct to me and all of my functional tests passed. Acked-by: David Ahern <redacted>
Thanks for the review! Regards