Thread (65 messages) 65 messages, 5 authors, 2018-05-30

Re: [RFC PATCH ghak32 V2 12/13] audit: NETFILTER_PKT: record each container ID associated with a netNS

From: Paul Moore <hidden>
Date: 2018-04-19 13:13:17
Also in: cgroups, linux-api, linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Richard Guy Briggs [off-list ref] wrote:
On 2018-04-18 22:10, Paul Moore wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 5:00 AM, Richard Guy Briggs [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Add container ID auxiliary record(s) to NETFILTER_PKT event standalone
records.  Iterate through all potential container IDs associated with a
network namespace.

Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <redacted>
---
 kernel/audit.c           |  1 +
 kernel/auditsc.c         |  2 ++
 net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
index 08662b4..3c77e47 100644
--- a/kernel/audit.c
+++ b/kernel/audit.c
@@ -2102,6 +2102,7 @@ int audit_log_container_info(struct audit_context *context,
        audit_log_end(ab);
        return 0;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_container_info);

 void audit_log_key(struct audit_buffer *ab, char *key)
 {
diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
index 208da962..af68d01 100644
--- a/kernel/auditsc.c
+++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
@@ -975,6 +975,7 @@ struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(void)
        context->in_syscall = 1;
        return context;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_alloc_local);

 inline void audit_free_context(struct audit_context *context)
 {
@@ -989,6 +990,7 @@ inline void audit_free_context(struct audit_context *context)
        audit_proctitle_free(context);
        kfree(context);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_free_context);

 static int audit_log_pid_context(struct audit_context *context, pid_t pid,
                                 kuid_t auid, kuid_t uid, unsigned int sessionid,
diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c b/net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c
index c502419..edaa456 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c
@@ -71,10 +71,14 @@ static bool audit_ip6(struct audit_buffer *ab, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
        struct audit_buffer *ab;
        int fam = -1;
+       struct audit_context *context = audit_alloc_local();
+       struct audit_containerid *cont;
+       int i = 0;
+       struct net *net;

        if (audit_enabled == 0)
                goto errout;
Do I need to say it?  I probably should ... the allocation should
happen after the audit_enabled check.
Already fixed in V3 in my tree a couple of weeks ago...
... which you never posted, at least not anywhere I've seen.  Which
effectively means I wasted a good chunk of time reviewing this code
late last night.  Awesome.
More timely review please?
More patience on your part?
quoted
quoted
-       ab = audit_log_start(NULL, GFP_ATOMIC, AUDIT_NETFILTER_PKT);
+       ab = audit_log_start(context, GFP_ATOMIC, AUDIT_NETFILTER_PKT);
        if (ab == NULL)
                goto errout;
@@ -104,7 +108,16 @@ static bool audit_ip6(struct audit_buffer *ab, struct sk_buff *skb)

        audit_log_end(ab);

+       net = sock_net(NETLINK_CB(skb).sk);
+       list_for_each_entry(cont, &net->audit_containerid, list) {
+               char buf[14];
+
+               sprintf(buf, "net%u", i++);
+               audit_log_container_info(context, buf, cont->id);
+       }
It seems like this could (should?) be hidden inside an audit function,
e.g. audit_log_net_containers() or something like that.
Perhaps...  It was open-coded since at this point there are no other
users.  That'll make this tidier though.
If the code was all contained within a single subsystem them I would
generally agree that open coding is preferable, but since we are
crossing a subsystem boundary I think it would be preferable to
abstract away the details into a separate function.

This will probably also be necessary once you change to using the
audit_net/net_generic mechanism.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help