Thread (52 messages) 52 messages, 11 authors, 2018-09-03

Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 00/11] udp gso

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2018-04-18 13:35:55


On 04/18/2018 05:31 AM, Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
I went through the patch set and the code looks fine- it extends existing
infra for TCP/GSO to UDP.

One thing that was not clear to me about the API: shouldn't UDP_SEGMENT
just be automatically determined in the stack from the pmtu? Whats
the motivation for the socket option for this? also AIUI this can be
either a per-socket or a per-packet option?

However, I share Sridhar's concerns about the very fundamental change
to UDP message boundary semantics here.  
There is no change at all.

This will only be used as a mechanism to send X packets of same size.

So instead of X system calls , one system call.

One traversal of some expensive part of the host stack.

The content on the wire should be the same.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help