Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/3] net: macb: Reorganize macb_mii bringup
From: Brad Mouring <hidden>
Date: 2018-03-10 22:19:20
Also in:
linux-devicetree
Hi Andrew, On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 05:17:18PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:12:31PM -0600, Brad Mouring wrote:quoted
The macb mii setup (mii_probe() and mii_init()) previously was somewhat interspersed, likely a result of organic growth and hacking.Hi Brad For netdev it is normal to include a cover note for patch series, which explains the big picture of the series. The cover note is then used as the merge commit message.quoted
This change moves mii bus registration into mii_init and probing the bus for devices into mii_probe. Signed-off-by: Brad Mouring <redacted> Suggested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> --- drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c index e84afcf1ecb5..7b69a291ab7a 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c@@ -470,10 +470,48 @@ static void macb_handle_link_change(struct net_device *dev) static int macb_mii_probe(struct net_device *dev) { struct macb *bp = netdev_priv(dev); - struct macb_platform_data *pdata; + struct macb_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&bp->pdev->dev); struct phy_device *phydev; + struct device_node *np = bp->pdev->dev.of_node; int phy_irq; - int ret; + int ret, i;These should be in 'Reverse Christmas Tree' order. i.e. longest first. That makes pdata tricky, so do the assignment in the body of the function.quoted
+ + if (np) { + if (of_phy_is_fixed_link(np)) { + if (of_phy_register_fixed_link(np) < 0) { + dev_err(&bp->pdev->dev, + "broken fixed-link specification\n"); + return -ENODEV; + } + bp->phy_node = of_node_get(np); + } else { + /* fallback to standard phy registration if no phy were + * found during dt phy registration + */ + if (!phy_find_first(bp->mii_bus)) { + for (i = 0; i < PHY_MAX_ADDR; i++) { + struct phy_device *phydev; + + phydev = mdiobus_scan(bp->mii_bus, i); + if (IS_ERR(phydev) && + PTR_ERR(phydev) != -ENODEV) { + ret = PTR_ERR(phydev); + break; + } + } + + if (ret) + return -ENODEV; + } + } + } else { + for (i = 0; i < PHY_MAX_ADDR; i++) + bp->mii_bus->irq[i] = PHY_POLL; + + if (pdata) + bp->mii_bus->phy_mask = pdata->phy_mask;I would say these two are to do with the mdio bus setup. Setting irq to POLL is not required, the core will do that. So you could add one patch removing that. Andrew
Thank you for the excellent feedback and patience. I've prepped a set of patches addressing your points, but I'd like to test the changes on hardware first (both with a DT that calls out the phys and one that depends on default discovery) prior to a v3 (with appropriate cover letter). Brad