Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 4 authors, 2018-03-21

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH REPOST v4 5/7] ixgbevf: keep writel() closer to wmb()

From: Alexander Duyck <hidden>
Date: 2018-03-21 21:53:26
Also in: intel-wired-lan, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, lkml

On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 2:51 PM,  [off-list ref] wrote:
On 2018-03-21 17:48, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 14:56 -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
quoted
Remove ixgbevf_write_tail() in favor of moving writel() close to
wmb().

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf.h      | 5 -----
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

This patch fails to compile because there is a call to
ixgbevf_write_tail() which you missed cleaning up.

Hah, I did a compile test but maybe I missed something. I will get v6 of
this patch only and leave the rest of the series as it is.
Actually you might want to just pull Jeff's tree and rebase before you
submit your patches. I suspect the difference is the ixgbevf XDP code
that is present in Jeff's tree and not in Dave's. The alternative is
to wait for Jeff to push the ixgbevf code and then once Dave has
pulled it you could rebase your patches.

Thanks.

- Alex
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help