On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 12:59 AM, Christoph Hellwig [off-list ref] wrote:

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 09:59:09PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:

quoted

I still struggle to understand why we need this "unmanaged"
complication and how a user of the sysfs API is expected to have any
idea whether a PF is managed or unmanaged and why they should care.
Can't we just have a pci_simple_sriov_configure() helper and ignore
this unmanaged business?  Thanks,

Just a pci_simple_sriov_configure is exactly what I envisioned originally.

I can drop the "unmanaged" bits if that is what is wanted, but based
on previous conversations I thought there was some concern about the
kernel loading VFs when there was some foreign entity managing the VFs
other than the kernel.

Thanks.

- Alex