Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2018-03-11

Re: [PATCH v2] net: netfilter: Replace printk() with appropriate pr_*() macro

From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: 2018-03-11 22:28:53
Also in: lkml, netfilter-devel

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 03:56:15AM +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 2:17 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso [off-list ref]
wrote:
quoted
Hi Joe,

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 12:52:41PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 01:11 +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote:
quoted
Using pr_<loglevel>() is more concise than
printk(KERN_<LOGLEVEL>).
Replace printks having a log level with the appropriate
pr_*() macros.

Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal <redacted>
---
changes in v2
*in v1 printk() were replaced with netdev_*()
quoted
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_acct.c      | 2 +-
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c    | 2 +-
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_timestamp.c | 2 +-
 net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c            | 2 +-
 net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c        | 4 ++--
 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
None of these files have a #define for pr_fmt so this
should be OK.
I think Arushi could add pr_fmt in the same go, so we skip another
follow up patch for this. @Arushi: I suggested this in my previous
email, please have a look.

Hello Pablo
Should I send two patches, one with the conversion of printk() to pr_() and
another for defining pr_fmt().

Or

only one patch with all the changes?
I think adding pr_fmt and use pr_() belongs to the same logical
change, so one patch for this is fine.

Thanks Arushi.

P.S: Please, just send your patch netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
next time, no need to Cc every list. Thanks!
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help