Re: [PATCH] net: phy: Move interrupt check from phy_check to phy_interrupt
flat view
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2018-03-08 16:29:38
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 04:50:42PM -0600, Brad Mouring wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
If multiple phys share the same interrupt (e.g. a multi-phy chip), the first device registered is the only one checked as phy_interrupt will always return IRQ_HANDLED if the first phydev is not halted. Move the interrupt check into phy_interrupt and, if it was not this phydev, return IRQ_NONE to allow other devices on this irq a chance to check if it was their interrupt. Signed-off-by: Brad Mouring <redacted> --- drivers/net/phy/phy.c | 16 ++++++---------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c index e3e29c2b028b..ff1aa815568f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c@@ -632,6 +632,12 @@ static irqreturn_t phy_interrupt(int irq, void *phy_dat) if (PHY_HALTED == phydev->state) return IRQ_NONE; /* It can't be ours. */ + if (phy_interrupt_is_valid(phydev)) {
Hi Brad Is this check needed? Can phy_interrupt() be called for a PHY which does not have an interrupt?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ if (phydev->drv->did_interrupt && + !phydev->drv->did_interrupt(phydev)) + return IRQ_NONE; + } + phy_change(phydev); return IRQ_HANDLED;@@ -725,16 +731,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(phy_stop_interrupts); */ void phy_change(struct phy_device *phydev) { - if (phy_interrupt_is_valid(phydev)) { - if (phydev->drv->did_interrupt && - !phydev->drv->did_interrupt(phydev)) - return; - - if (phydev->state == PHY_HALTED) - if (phy_disable_interrupts(phydev)) - goto phy_err; - } -
phy_change() can also be called via phy_mac_interrupt(). I wonder if this change is going to break anything? Did you think about that? Thanks Andrew