Re: [PATCH v3] kernel.h: Skip single-eval logic on literals in min()/max()
flat view
From: Miguel Ojeda <hidden>
Date: 2018-03-10 07:03:47
Also in:
linux-btrfs, lkml
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 7:10 AM, Miguel Ojeda [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 4:11 AM, Randy Dunlap [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 03/09/2018 04:07 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:quoted
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 12:05:36 -0800 Kees Cook [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
When max() is used in stack array size calculations from literal values (e.g. "char foo[max(sizeof(struct1), sizeof(struct2))]", the compiler thinks this is a dynamic calculation due to the single-eval logic, which is not needed in the literal case. This change removes several accidental stack VLAs from an x86 allmodconfig build: $ diff -u before.txt after.txt | grep ^- -drivers/input/touchscreen/cyttsp4_core.c:871:2: warning: ISO C90 forbids variable length array ‘ids’ [-Wvla] -fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c:344:4: warning: ISO C90 forbids variable length array ‘namebuf’ [-Wvla] -lib/vsprintf.c:747:2: warning: ISO C90 forbids variable length array ‘sym’ [-Wvla] -net/ipv4/proc.c:403:2: warning: ISO C90 forbids variable length array ‘buff’ [-Wvla] -net/ipv6/proc.c:198:2: warning: ISO C90 forbids variable length array ‘buff’ [-Wvla] -net/ipv6/proc.c:218:2: warning: ISO C90 forbids variable length array ‘buff64’ [-Wvla] Based on an earlier patch from Josh Poimboeuf.v1, v2 and v3 of this patch all fail with gcc-4.4.4: ./include/linux/jiffies.h: In function 'jiffies_delta_to_clock_t': ./include/linux/jiffies.h:444: error: first argument to '__builtin_choose_expr' not a constantI'm seeing that problem withquoted
gcc --versiongcc (SUSE Linux) 4.8.5Same here, 4.8.5 fails. gcc 5.4.1 seems to work. I compiled a minimal 5.1.0 and it seems to work as well.
Just compiled 4.9.0 and it seems to work -- so that would be the minimum required. Sigh... Some enterprise distros are either already shipping gcc >= 5 or will probably be shipping it soon (e.g. RHEL 8), so how much does it hurt to ask for a newer gcc? Are there many users/companies out there using enterprise distributions' gcc to compile and run the very latest kernels? Miguel