On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 10:08 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 09:56:46AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:

quoted

I have a patchset that creates a vsprintf extension for
print_vma_addr and removes all the uses similar to the
print_symbol() removal.

This now avoids any possible printk interleaving.

Unfortunately, without some #ifdef in vsprintf, which
I would like to avoid, it increases the nommu kernel
size by ~500 bytes.

Anyone think this is acceptable?

[]

This doesn't feel like a huge win since it's only called ~once per
architecture.  I'd be more excited if it made the printing of the whole
thing standardised; eg we have a print_fault() function in mm/memory.c
which takes a suitable set of arguments.

Sure but perhaps that's not feasible as the surrounding output
is per-arch specific.

What could be a standardized fault message here?

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel