Re: [RFC PATCH v2] ptr_ring: linked list fallback
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Date: 2018-02-28 06:28:28
Also in:
lkml
On 2018年02月28日 12:09, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
quoted
quoted
Or we can add plist to a union: struct sk_buff { union { struct { /* These two members must be first. */ struct sk_buff *next; struct sk_buff *prev; union { struct net_device *dev; /* Some protocols might use this space to store information, * while device pointer would be NULL. * UDP receive path is one user. */ unsigned long dev_scratch; }; }; struct rb_node rbnode; /* used in netem & tcp stack */ + struct plist plist; /* For use with ptr_ring */ };This look ok.quoted
quoted
For XDP, we need to embed plist in struct xdp_buff too,Right - that's pretty straightforward, isn't it?Yes, it's not clear to me this is really needed for XDP consider the lock contention it brings. ThanksThe contention is only when the ring overflows into the list though.
Right, but there's usually a mismatch of speed between producer and consumer. In case of a fast producer, we may get this contention very frequently. Thanks