Hi Al,
I totally agree the Greg's suggestion, I think v9fs is the direction
as the VirtFS in the virtualization field, that it still deserves to
be used and developed, so I also suggestion you can apply (or nack)
the patch as v9fs maintainer, I hope you won't refuse.
Thanks,
Yiwen.
On 2018/2/21 0:48, Greg Kurz wrote:
Hi Al,
It's been two years without any sign of life from 9p maintainers... :-\
Would you apply (or nack) this patch ?
Thanks,
--
Greg
PS: in the case you apply it, probable Cc stable@vger.kernel.org as well
On Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:38:49 +0100
Greg Kurz [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
If it was interrupted by a signal, the 9p client may need to send some
more requests to the server for cleanup before returning to userspace.
To avoid such a last minute request to be interrupted right away, the
client memorizes if a signal is pending, clear TIF_SIGPENDING, handle
the request and call recalc_sigpending() before returning.
Unfortunately, if the transmission of this cleanup request fails for any
reason, the transport returns an error and the client propagates it right
away, without calling recalc_sigpending().
This ends up with -ERESTARTSYS from the initially interrupted request
crawling up to syscall exit, with TIF_SIGPENDING cleared by the cleanup
request. The specific signal handling code, which is responsible for
converting -ERESTARTSYS to -EINTR is not called, and userspace receives
the confusing errno value:
open: Unknown error 512 (512)
This is really hard to hit in real life. I discovered the issue while
working on hot-unplug of a virtio-9p-pci device with an instrumented
QEMU allowing to control request completion.
Both p9_client_zc_rpc() and p9_client_rpc() functions have this buggy
error path actually. Their code flow is a bit obscure and the best
thing to do would probably be a full rewrite: to really ensure this
situation of clearing TIF_SIGPENDING and returning -ERESTARTSYS can
never happen.
But given the general lack of interest for the 9p code, I won't risk
breaking more things. So this patch simply fix the buggy paths in both
functions with a trivial label+goto.
Thanks to Laurent Dufour for his help and suggestions on how to find
the root cause and how to fix it.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <redacted>
---
net/9p/client.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/9p/client.c b/net/9p/client.c
index 4c8cf9c1631a..5154eaf19fff 100644
--- a/net/9p/client.c
+++ b/net/9p/client.c
@@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ p9_client_rpc(struct p9_client *c, int8_t type, const char *fmt, ...)
if (err < 0) {
if (err != -ERESTARTSYS && err != -EFAULT)
c->status = Disconnected;
- goto reterr;
+ goto recalc_sigpending;
}
again:
/* Wait for the response */@@ -804,6 +804,7 @@ p9_client_rpc(struct p9_client *c, int8_t type, const char *fmt, ...)
if (req->status == REQ_STATUS_RCVD)
err = 0;
}
+recalc_sigpending:
if (sigpending) {
spin_lock_irqsave(¤t->sighand->siglock, flags);
recalc_sigpending();@@ -867,7 +868,7 @@ static struct p9_req_t *p9_client_zc_rpc(struct p9_client *c, int8_t type,
if (err == -EIO)
c->status = Disconnected;
if (err != -ERESTARTSYS)
- goto reterr;
+ goto recalc_sigpending;
}
if (req->status == REQ_STATUS_ERROR) {
p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "req_status error %d\n", req->t_err);@@ -885,6 +886,7 @@ static struct p9_req_t *p9_client_zc_rpc(struct p9_client *c, int8_t type,
if (req->status == REQ_STATUS_RCVD)
err = 0;
}
+recalc_sigpending:
if (sigpending) {
spin_lock_irqsave(¤t->sighand->siglock, flags);
recalc_sigpending();
------------------------------------------------------------------------------Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
V9fs-developer mailing list
V9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/v9fs-developer
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
V9fs-developer mailing list
V9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/v9fs-developer
.