Re: [PATCH][V2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: avoid unintended sign extension on a 16 bit shift
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Date: 2018-02-19 17:37:20
Also in:
kernel-janitors, lkml
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 12:19:16PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
This seems to be somewhat excessive 64bit maths on a 32bit system. It is more than enough to make timelo/timehi 'unsigned int'.
Do you see a difference in the generated code? Thanks, Richard