Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 4 authors, 2018-02-05

possible deadlock in rtnl_lock (2)

From: syzbot <hidden>
Date: 2018-02-01 18:58:24
Also in: lkml

Hello,

syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
255442c93843f52b6891b21d0b485bf2c97f93c3 (Thu Feb 1 03:25:25 2018 +0000)
Merge tag 'docs-4.16' of git://git.lwn.net/linux

So far this crash happened 1587 times on net-next, upstream.
C reproducer is attached.
syzkaller reproducer is attached.
Raw console output is attached.
compiler: gcc (GCC) 7.1.1 20170620
.config is attached.

IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+61e4972c2b1d5e08a5c2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
It will help syzbot understand when the bug is fixed. See footer for  
details.
If you forward the report, please keep this part and the footer.


======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
4.15.0+ #290 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syzkaller681093/4124 is trying to acquire lock:
  (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<00000000c3d62391>] rtnl_lock+0x17/0x20  
net/core/rtnetlink.c:74

but task is already holding lock:
  (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}, at: [<0000000051813e83>] lock_sock  
include/net/sock.h:1461 [inline]
  (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}, at: [<0000000051813e83>] ip_setsockopt+0x8c/0xb0  
net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1259

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}:
        lock_sock_nested+0xc2/0x110 net/core/sock.c:2780
        lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1461 [inline]
        do_ip_getsockopt+0x1b3/0x2170 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1335
        ip_getsockopt+0x90/0x220 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1566
        tcp_getsockopt+0x82/0xd0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:3359
        sock_common_getsockopt+0x95/0xd0 net/core/sock.c:2937
        SYSC_getsockopt net/socket.c:1880 [inline]
        SyS_getsockopt+0x178/0x340 net/socket.c:1862
        entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x29/0xa0

-> #0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}:
        lock_acquire+0x1d5/0x580 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3920
        __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:756 [inline]
        __mutex_lock+0x16f/0x1a80 kernel/locking/mutex.c:893
        mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:908
        rtnl_lock+0x17/0x20 net/core/rtnetlink.c:74
        register_netdevice_notifier+0xad/0x860 net/core/dev.c:1607
        tee_tg_check+0x1a0/0x280 net/netfilter/xt_TEE.c:106
        xt_check_target+0x22c/0x7d0 net/netfilter/x_tables.c:845
        check_target net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:513 [inline]
        find_check_entry.isra.8+0x8c8/0xcb0  
net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:554
        translate_table+0xed1/0x1610 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:725
        do_replace net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1141 [inline]
        do_ipt_set_ctl+0x370/0x5f0 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1675
        nf_sockopt net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:106 [inline]
        nf_setsockopt+0x67/0xc0 net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:115
        ip_setsockopt+0xa1/0xb0 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1260
        sctp_setsockopt+0x2b6/0x61d0 net/sctp/socket.c:4104
        sock_common_setsockopt+0x95/0xd0 net/core/sock.c:2978
        SYSC_setsockopt net/socket.c:1849 [inline]
        SyS_setsockopt+0x189/0x360 net/socket.c:1828
        entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x29/0xa0

other info that might help us debug this:

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(sk_lock-AF_INET);
                                lock(rtnl_mutex);
                                lock(sk_lock-AF_INET);
   lock(rtnl_mutex);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syzkaller681093/4124:
  #0:  (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}, at: [<0000000051813e83>] lock_sock  
include/net/sock.h:1461 [inline]
  #0:  (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}, at: [<0000000051813e83>]  
ip_setsockopt+0x8c/0xb0 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1259

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 4124 Comm: syzkaller681093 Not tainted 4.15.0+ #290
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS  
Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:17 [inline]
  dump_stack+0x194/0x257 lib/dump_stack.c:53
  print_circular_bug.isra.38+0x2cd/0x2dc kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1223
  check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1863 [inline]
  check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1976 [inline]
  validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2417 [inline]
  __lock_acquire+0x30a8/0x3e00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3431
  lock_acquire+0x1d5/0x580 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3920
  __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:756 [inline]
  __mutex_lock+0x16f/0x1a80 kernel/locking/mutex.c:893
  mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:908
  rtnl_lock+0x17/0x20 net/core/rtnetlink.c:74
  register_netdevice_notifier+0xad/0x860 net/core/dev.c:1607
  tee_tg_check+0x1a0/0x280 net/netfilter/xt_TEE.c:106
  xt_check_target+0x22c/0x7d0 net/netfilter/x_tables.c:845
  check_target net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:513 [inline]
  find_check_entry.isra.8+0x8c8/0xcb0 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:554
  translate_table+0xed1/0x1610 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:725
  do_replace net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1141 [inline]
  do_ipt_set_ctl+0x370/0x5f0 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1675
  nf_sockopt net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:106 [inline]
  nf_setsockopt+0x67/0xc0 net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:115
  ip_setsockopt+0xa1/0xb0 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1260
  sctp_setsockopt+0x2b6/0x61d0 net/sctp/socket.c:4104
  sock_common_setsockopt+0x95/0xd0 net/core/sock.c:2978
  SYSC_setsockopt net/socket.c:1849 [inline]
  SyS_setsockopt+0x189/0x360 net/socket.c:1828
  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x29/0xa0
RIP: 0033:0x445bd9
RSP: 002b:00007fffdfb6a998 EFLAGS: 00000203 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: ffffffffffffffff RCX: 0000000000445bd9
RDX: 0000000000000040 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 00007fffdfb6aa48 R08: 0000000000000318 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 000000002


---
This bug is generated by a dumb bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for details.
Direct all questions to syzkaller@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this bug report.
If you forgot to add the Reported-by tag, once the fix for this bug is  
merged
into any tree, please reply to this email with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want to test a patch for this bug, please reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch
and provide the patch inline or as an attachment.
To mark this as a duplicate of another syzbot report, please reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If it's a one-off invalid bug report, please reply with:
#syz invalid
Note: if the crash happens again, it will cause creation of a new bug  
report.
Note: all commands must start from beginning of the line in the email body.

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help