Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 7 authors, 2018-02-13

Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in sock_release

From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Date: 2018-02-13 19:16:41
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Al Viro [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 05:18:33AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:07:19AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
quoted
Incidentally, grepping for sys_close() shows another piece of fun in
net/netfilter/xt_bpf.c.  Folks, ONCE DESCRIPTOR IS INSTALLED, THAT'S
IT; THERE'S NO REMOVING IT ON FAILURE EXITS.  sys_close() should
never, ever be used that way.  Sigh...
Would be great do unexport the thing.  Except that we also have
binfmt_misc (which looks legit) and autofs4, which on crack decided
that close() isn't a fun syscall, they'd much rather have an ioctl
that does exactly the same..
Yes, since binfmt_misc one is guaranteed that its descriptor table is
not shared - all callchains go through do_execveat_common(), where we'd
use unshare_files().  autofs one is... not in good taste, but still
safe; there the descriptor is preexisting and it's essentially a weird
way of spelling close(2).  References from syscall tables are, of course,
OK.  init/*.c uses are done pretty much from userland - they could have
been straight syscalls, if not for the lack of klibc in kernel tree.
Everything else, though...

IMO we need a whack-a-mole list somewhere; "new callers of sys_close()
anywhere outside of init/* and syscall tables" definitely should be
on it...

#syz fix: fix kcm_clone()
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help