Re: [patch net-next] mlxsw: spectrum_switchdev: Allow port enslavement to a VLAN-unaware bridge
From: David Ahern <hidden>
Date: 2018-02-22 19:27:37
On 2/22/18 11:58 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: David Ahern <redacted> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:16:35 -0700quoted
On 2/20/18 12:45 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:quoted
From: Ido Schimmel <redacted> Up until now we only allowed VLAN devices to be put in a VLAN-unaware bridge, but some users need the ability to enslave physical ports as well. This is achieved by mapping the port and VID 1 to the bridge's vFID, instead of the port and the VID used by the VLAN device. The above is valid because as long as the port is not enslaved to a bridge, VID 1 is guaranteed to be configured as PVID and egress untagged. Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <redacted> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <redacted> --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c | 12 +++++------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)Maybe I am missing something in the setup, but I am not getting host-to-host connectivity. I booted a switch with this patch, configured a bridge:I'm waiting for this discussion to be fully resolved before applying this patch. Just FYI...
Ido: IPv4 works at boot; IPv6 requires the mcast snooping disable. For this vlan-unaware bridges can that be set automatically? And then, what are the options for lldp?