On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 05:48:48PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:

On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 11:18 AM, Richard Haines
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Add ip option support to allow LSM security modules to utilise CIPSO/IPv4
and CALIPSO/IPv6 services.

Signed-off-by: Richard Haines <redacted>
---
All SCTP lksctp-tools/src/func_tests run correctly in enforcing mode.
All "./sctp-tests run" obtained from: https://github.com/sctp/sctp-tests
pass.

V7 Changes:
1) Log when copy ip options fail for IPv4 and IPv6
2) Correct sctp_setsockopt_maxseg() function. Note that the lksctp-tools
func_tests do not test with struct sctp_assoc_value. Just used simple test
and okay.
3) Move calculation of overheads to sctp_packet_config().
NOTE: Initially in sctp_packet_reset() I set packet->size and
packet->overhead to zero (as it is a reset). This was okay for all the
lksctp-tools function tests, however when running "sctp-tests" ndatshched
tests it causes these to fail with an st_s.log entry of:
        sid: 3, expected: 3
        sid: 3, expected: 3
        unexpected sid packet !!!
        sid: 1, expected: 3

I then found sctp_packet_transmit() relies on setting
"packet->size = packet->overhead;" to reset size to the current overhead
after sending packets, hence the comment in sctp_packet_reset()

V8 Change:
Fix sparse warning:
net/sctp/protocol.c:269:28: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
highlighted in [1] for sctp_v4_ip_options_len() function.

[1] https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all/2018-February/043695.html

 include/net/sctp/sctp.h    |  4 +++-
 include/net/sctp/structs.h |  2 ++
 net/sctp/chunk.c           | 10 +++++++---
 net/sctp/ipv6.c            | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 net/sctp/output.c          | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 net/sctp/protocol.c        | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 net/sctp/socket.c          | 11 ++++++++---
 7 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

Thanks Richard.

Neil and Marcelo, I transfered your acked-by to this patch, if you've
got any objections to that please let me know.

That's fine by me. Thanks

  Marcelo