Thread (36 messages) flat view 36 messages, 3 authors, 2018-02-26
STALE3127d REVIEWED: 1 (0M)

1 review trailer.

[PATCH net-next v3 04/32] net: Move mutex_unlock() in cleanup_net() up

From: Kirill Tkhai <hidden>
Date: 2018-02-13 09:26:41
Subsystem: networking [general], the rest · Maintainers: "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds

net_sem protects from pernet_list changing, while
ops_free_list() makes simple kfree(), and it can't
race with other pernet_operations callbacks.

So we may release net_mutex earlier then it was.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <redacted>
Acked-by: Andrei Vagin <redacted>
---
 net/core/net_namespace.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/net_namespace.c b/net/core/net_namespace.c
index e89b2b7abd36..f8453c438798 100644
--- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
+++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
@@ -522,11 +522,12 @@ static void cleanup_net(struct work_struct *work)
 	list_for_each_entry_reverse(ops, &pernet_list, list)
 		ops_exit_list(ops, &net_exit_list);
 
+	mutex_unlock(&net_mutex);
+
 	/* Free the net generic variables */
 	list_for_each_entry_reverse(ops, &pernet_list, list)
 		ops_free_list(ops, &net_exit_list);
 
-	mutex_unlock(&net_mutex);
 	up_read(&net_sem);
 
 	/* Ensure there are no outstanding rcu callbacks using this
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help