On 2/1/18 4:09 AM, Serhey Popovych wrote:

David Ahern wrote:

quoted

quoted

diff --git a/bridge/link.c b/bridge/link.c
index a11cbb1..90c9734 100644
--- a/bridge/link.c
+++ b/bridge/link.c

@@ -125,20 +125,13 @@ int print_linkinfo(const struct sockaddr_nl *who,
 	if (n->nlmsg_type == RTM_DELLINK)
 		fprintf(fp, "Deleted ");
 
-	fprintf(fp, "%d: %s ", ifi->ifi_index,
-		tb[IFLA_IFNAME] ? rta_getattr_str(tb[IFLA_IFNAME]) : "<nil>");
+	fprintf(fp, "%d: ", ifi->ifi_index);
+
+	print_name_and_link("%s: ", COLOR_NONE, name, tb);

It only needs tb[IFLA_LINK] so just pass it. Makes the arg list
consistent with the function name too.

Unfortunately not only: it uses IFLA_LINK_NETNSID too. May be adding
"_rta" suffix to this routine as we did in the past when introducing
get_addr_rta() and similar routines? In my opinion this is preferred
than adding one more parameters to the routine.

ok, tb arg is fine. I missed the IFLA_LINK_NETNSID case.