Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] sfc: efx_default_channel_want_txqs() can be static
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2018-01-26 16:13:03
Also in:
lkml
From: Edward Cree <redacted> Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 15:13:05 +0000
On 26/01/18 01:03, kbuild test robot wrote:quoted
Fixes: 2935e3c38228 ("sfc: on 8000 series use TX queues for TX timestamps") Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <redacted>Acked-by: Edward Cree <redacted> Dave, can you take this directly or do you need it reposted without RFC tags? I'm not sure what the procedure is for robopatches.
No I cannot. Don't you even notice that the subject line and commit message are totally inaccurate? They say that one function is being marked static. But the patch actually marks two different functions static, as well as a structure which is also completely not mentioned in the commit message nor subject line.