Re: [PATCH v6 22/36] nds32: Debugging support
From: Arnd Bergmann <hidden>
Date: 2018-01-18 10:37:02
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-devicetree, linux-serial, lkml
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 6:53 AM, Greentime Hu [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Greentime Hu <greentime-MUIXKm3Oiri1Z/+hSey0Gg@public.gmane.org> This patch adds ptrace support. Signed-off-by: Vincent Chen <vincentc-MUIXKm3Oiri1Z/+hSey0Gg@public.gmane.org> Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu <greentime-MUIXKm3Oiri1Z/+hSey0Gg@public.gmane.org>
I must have missed this patch earlier, unfortunately I don't think this is ready:
+long arch_ptrace(struct task_struct *child, long request, unsigned long addr,
+ unsigned long data)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ switch (request) {
+ case PTRACE_PEEKUSR:
+ ret =
+ ptrace_read_user(child, addr, (unsigned long __user *)data);
+ break;
+
+ case PTRACE_POKEUSR:
+ ret = ptrace_write_user(child, addr, data);
+ break;
+
+ case PTRACE_GETREGS:
+ ret = ptrace_getregs(child, (void __user *)data);
+ break;
+
+ case PTRACE_SETREGS:
+ ret = ptrace_setregs(child, (void __user *)data);
+ break;
+
+ case PTRACE_GETFPREGS:
+ ret = ptrace_getfpregs(child, (void __user *)data);
+ break;
+
+ case PTRACE_SETFPREGS:
+ ret = ptrace_setfpregs(child, (void __user *)data);
+ break;
+
+ default:
+ ret = ptrace_request(child, request, addr, data);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
It appears that you are implementing the old-style ptrace handling
with architecture specific commands. Please have a look at how
this is done in risc-v or arm64. If this takes more too much time
to address, I'd suggest using an empty stub function for sys_ptrace
and adding it back at a later point, but not send the current version
upstream.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html