Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the bpf tree
From: Alexei Starovoitov <hidden>
Date: 2018-01-09 00:29:22
Also in:
linux-next, lkml
From: Alexei Starovoitov <hidden>
Date: 2018-01-09 00:29:22
Also in:
linux-next, lkml
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 11:21:25AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c between commit: 2b36047e7889 ("selftests/bpf: fix test_align") from the bpf tree and commit: 6a28b446b7d2 ("selftests/bpf: adjust test_align expected output") from the net-next tree. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell diff --cc tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c index 471bbbdb94db,fe916d29e166..000000000000--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c@@@ -473,8 -473,28 +473,8 @@@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = REJECT, .matches = { - {4, "R5=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=0,imm=0)"}, + {4, "R5_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=0,imm=0)"},
thanks. That's correct resolution.