Re: atm/clip: Use seq_puts() in svc_addr()
flat view
From: Stefano Brivio <hidden>
Date: 2018-01-07 15:30:20
Also in:
kernel-janitors, lkml
On Sun, 7 Jan 2018 09:19:17 +0100 SF Markus Elfring [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
Two strings should be quickly put into a sequence by two function calls. Thus use the function "seq_puts" instead of "seq_printf". This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.Can you please explain what the issue really is and what you're trying to do here?Is the function "seq_puts" a bit more efficient for the desired output of a single string in comparison to calling the function "seq_printf" for this purpose?
Will you please be so kind and tell us?
quoted
One shouldn't need to dig into Coccinelle patterns to find out what you mean,Why did an attribution for a software tool confuse you?
I'm not confused. I'm saying that one shouldn't need to dig into Coccinelle patterns to find out what you mean.
quoted
and "strings should be quickly put into a sequence" isn't terribly helpful.Which wording would you find more appropriate for the suggested adjustment of these function calls?
Whatever describes the actual issue and what you're doing about it. Turn your rhetorical question above into a commit message, done. Compare that with your original commit message, on the other hand, and you should understand what I mean. -- Stefano