Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] tuntap: XDP transmission
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: 2018-01-01 03:55:23
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, 2018-01-01 at 11:48 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
Hi Jason, I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on net-next/master] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jason-Wang/XDP-transmission-for-tuntap/20180101-105946 config: i386-randconfig-x072-201800 (attached as .config) compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.2.0-12) 7.2.1 20171025 reproduce: # save the attached .config to linux build tree make ARCH=i386 All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers//net/tun.c: In function 'tun_xdp_to_ptr':quoted
quoted
drivers//net/tun.c:251:9: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]return (void *)((unsigned long)ptr | TUN_XDP_FLAG); ^ drivers//net/tun.c: In function 'tun_ptr_to_xdp': drivers//net/tun.c:257:9: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast] return (void *)((unsigned long)ptr & ~TUN_XDP_FLAG); ^ vim +251 drivers//net/tun.c 248 249 void *tun_xdp_to_ptr(void *ptr) 250 { > 251 return (void *)((unsigned long)ptr | TUN_XDP_FLAG);
Does TUN_XDP_FLAG really need to be 0x1ULL? Wouldn't 0x1UL suffice?