Thread (24 messages) 24 messages, 4 authors, 2018-01-24
STALE3056d
Revisions (4)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v3 [diff vs current]
  3. v6 [diff vs current]
  4. v8 current

[PATCH bpf-next v8 04/12] bpf: Only reply field should be writeable

From: Lawrence Brakmo <hidden>
Date: 2018-01-24 07:58:13
Subsystem: bpf [general] (safe dynamic programs and tools), bpf [networking] (tcx & tc bpf, sock_addr), networking [general], the rest · Maintainers: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko, Eduard Zingerman, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Martin KaFai Lau, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds

Currently, a sock_ops BPF program can write the op field and all the
reply fields (reply and replylong). This is a bug. The op field should
not have been writeable and there is currently no way to use replylong
field for indices >= 1. This patch enforces that only the reply field
(which equals replylong[0]) is writeable.

Fixes: 40304b2a1567 ("bpf: BPF support for sock_ops")
Signed-off-by: Lawrence Brakmo <redacted>
---
 net/core/filter.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 0cf170f..c356ec0 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -3845,8 +3845,7 @@ static bool sock_ops_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
 {
 	if (type == BPF_WRITE) {
 		switch (off) {
-		case offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops, op) ...
-		     offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops, replylong[3]):
+		case offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops, reply):
 			break;
 		default:
 			return false;
-- 
2.9.5
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help