Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2018-01-18

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Check gso_size of packets when forwarding

From: Pravin Shelar <hidden>
Date: 2018-01-18 21:57:50

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 5:08 AM, Daniel Axtens [off-list ref] wrote:
Pravin Shelar [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Daniel Axtens [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
When regular packets are forwarded, we validate their size against the
MTU of the destination device. However, when GSO packets are
forwarded, we do not validate their size against the MTU. We
implicitly assume that when they are segmented, the resultant packets
will be correctly sized.

This is not always the case.

We observed a case where a packet received on an ibmveth device had a
GSO size of around 10kB. This was forwarded by Open vSwitch to a bnx2x
device, where it caused a firmware assert. This is described in detail
at [0] and was the genesis of this series. Rather than fixing it in
the driver, this series fixes the forwarding path.
Are there any other possible forwarding path in networking stack? TC
is one subsystem that could forward such a packet to the bnx2x device,
how is that handled ?
So far I have only looked at bridges, openvswitch and macvlan. In
general, if the code uses dev_forward_skb() it should automatically be
fine as that invokes is_skb_forwardable(), which we patch.
But there are other ways to forward packets, e.g tc-mirred or bpf
redirect. We need to handle all these cases rather than fixing one at
a time. As Jason suggested netif_needs_gso() looks like good function
to validate if a device is capable of handling given GSO packet.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help