On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 09:46 -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
quoted
Then that's increasing the udp_sock structure size for a narrow use
case which will get push back. I think it's going to be better to
stick with one sock pointer. We could maybe redefine sk_user_data as a
pointer to an allocated structure or array so it can hold multiple
user_data pointers (in lieu of chaining).
We do not have a lot of UDP sockets per host, I do not believe it
should be a problem adding stuff in them.
Eric,
Is QUIC using unconnected sockets then?
Tom