Re: WARNING in strp_data_ready
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Date: 2017-12-27 18:25:58
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Dmitry Vyukov [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
[off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 10/24/2017 08:20 AM, syzbot wrote:quoted
Hello, syzkaller hit the following crash on 73d3393ada4f70fa3df5639c8d438f2f034c0ecb git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/master compiler: gcc (GCC) 7.1.1 20170620 .config is attached Raw console output is attached. C reproducer is attached syzkaller reproducer is attached. See https://goo.gl/kgGztJ for information about syzkaller reproducers WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2996 at ./include/net/sock.h:1505 sock_owned_by_me include/net/sock.h:1505 [inline] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2996 at ./include/net/sock.h:1505 sock_owned_by_user include/net/sock.h:1511 [inline] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2996 at ./include/net/sock.h:1505 strp_data_ready+0x2b7/0x390 net/strparser/strparser.c:404 Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ... CPU: 0 PID: 2996 Comm: syzkaller142210 Not tainted 4.14.0-rc5+ #138 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <IRQ> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:16 [inline] dump_stack+0x194/0x257 lib/dump_stack.c:52 panic+0x1e4/0x417 kernel/panic.c:181 __warn+0x1c4/0x1d9 kernel/panic.c:542 report_bug+0x211/0x2d0 lib/bug.c:183 fixup_bug+0x40/0x90 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:178 do_trap_no_signal arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:212 [inline] do_trap+0x260/0x390 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:261 do_error_trap+0x120/0x390 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:298 do_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:311 invalid_op+0x18/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:905 RIP: 0010:sock_owned_by_me include/net/sock.h:1505 [inline] RIP: 0010:sock_owned_by_user include/net/sock.h:1511 [inline] RIP: 0010:strp_data_ready+0x2b7/0x390 net/strparser/strparser.c:404 RSP: 0018:ffff8801db206b18 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: ffff8801d1e02080 RBX: ffff8801dad74c48 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000100 RSI: ffff8801d29fa0a0 RDI: ffffffff85cbede0 RBP: ffff8801db206b38 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 1ffffffff0ce0bcd R10: ffff8801db206a00 R11: dffffc0000000000 R12: ffff8801d29fa000 R13: ffff8801dad74c50 R14: ffff8801d4350a92 R15: 0000000000000001 psock_data_ready+0x56/0x70 net/kcm/kcmsock.c:353Looks like KCM is calling sk_data_ready() without first taking the sock lock. /* Called with lower sock held */ static void kcm_rcv_strparser(struct strparser *strp, struct sk_buff *skb) { [...] if (kcm_queue_rcv_skb(&kcm->sk, skb)) { In this case kcm->sk is not the same lock the comment is referring to. And kcm_queue_rcv_skb() will eventually call sk_data_ready(). @Tom, how about wrapping the sk_data_ready call in {lock|release}_sock? I don't have anything better in mind immediately.The sock locks are taken in reverse order in the send path so so grabbing kcm sock lock with lower lock held to call sk_data_ready may lead to deadlock like I think. It might be possible to change the order in the send path to do this. Something like: trylock on lower socket lock -if trylock fails - release kcm sock lock - lock lower sock - lock kcm sock - call sendpage locked function I admit that dealing with two levels of socket locks in the data path is quite a pain :-)up still happening and we've lost 50K+ test VMs on this
up Still happens and number of crashes crossed 60K, can we do something with this please?