Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/6] net: tcp: sctp: dccp: Replace jprobe usage with trace events
flat view
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2017-12-21 03:12:45
Also in:
linux-sctp, lkml
On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:36:57 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 14:24:24 -0500 (EST) David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 14:20:40 -0500 (EST)quoted
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 13:14:11 +0900quoted
This series is v4 of the replacement of jprobe usage with trace events. This version is rebased on net-next, fixes a build warning and moves a temporal variable definition in a block. Previous version is here; https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/19/153 Changes from v3: All: Rebased on net-next [3/6]: fixes a build warning for i386 by casting pointer unsigned long instead of __u64, and moves a temporal variable definition in a block.Looks good, series applied to net-next, thanks.Actually, this doesn't even compile, so I've reverted: [davem@dhcp-10-15-49-227 net-next]$ make -s -j16 In file included from net/dccp/trace.h:105:0, from net/dccp/proto.c:42: ./include/trace/define_trace.h:89:42: fatal error: ./trace.h: No such file or directory #include TRACE_INCLUDE(TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE) ^ compilation terminated.Hi David, Could you share your .config file? I would like to reproduce it. When I tried with attached kconfig, I could not reproduce this issue, and could run it.
Hi Masami, Are you sure you committed everything in this change set? I don't see a modification of the Makefile to get the trace.h file you created. Shouldn't there be something like: CFLAGS_proto.o := -I$(src) in the Makefile? -- Steve