2017-12-09 0:28 GMT+08:00 David Miller [off-list ref]:
From: Yafang Shao <redacted>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 23:50:44 +0800
quoted
2017-12-08 23:42 GMT+08:00 David Miller [off-list ref]:
quoted
From: Yafang Shao <redacted>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 11:40:23 +0800
quoted
It will looks like these,
if (sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_TCP)
__tcp_set_state(newsk, TCP_SYN_RECV);
else
newsk->sk_state = TCP_SYN_RECV;
if (sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_TCP)
__tcp_set_state(sk, TCP_CLOSE);
else
sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
if (sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_TCP)
tcp_state_store(sk, state);
else
sk_state_store(sk, state);
Some redundant code.
IMO, put these similar code into a wrapper is more nice.
I think this discussion and how ugly this is getting shows that
tracing the state transitions of a socket is perhaps not best as a TCP
specific feature.
Do you mean that tcp_set_state tracepoint should be replaced with
sk_set_state tracepoint and move that tracepoint to
trace/events/sock.h ?
Yes, something like that.
It will avoid all of these protocol specific checks and weird
dependencies.
That looks like a good idea.
I will try to reimplemnet it.
Thanks
Yafang