Re: [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 10/14] tun: setup xdp_rxq_info
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hidden>
Date: 2017-12-21 15:42:38
On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:48:01 +0800 Jason Wang [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c index e367d6310353..f1df08c2c541 100644 --- a/drivers/net/tun.c +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c@@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ struct tun_file { struct list_head next; struct tun_struct *detached; struct skb_array tx_array; + struct xdp_rxq_info xdp_rxq; }; struct tun_flow_entry {@@ -687,8 +688,10 @@ static void __tun_detach(struct tun_file *tfile, bool clean) tun->dev->reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED) unregister_netdevice(tun->dev); } - if (tun) + if (tun) { skb_array_cleanup(&tfile->tx_array); + xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&tfile->xdp_rxq); + } sock_put(&tfile->sk); } }@@ -728,11 +731,15 @@ static void tun_detach_all(struct net_device *dev) tun_napi_del(tun, tfile); /* Drop read queue */ tun_queue_purge(tfile); + skb_array_cleanup(&tfile->tx_array);Looks like this is unnecessary, skb array will be cleaned up only when fd is closed otherwise there will be a double free.
What code path is called on "fd close" which call skb_array_cleanup() ? (Is it __tun_detach()?) Then, I guess I don't need below xdp_rxq_info_unreg() either, right?
quoted
+ xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&tfile->xdp_rxq); sock_put(&tfile->sk);
-- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer