netdevsim: remove check on return value of debugfs_create_dir

Initial discussion started about correct handling of this condition.
Later it was decided to remove this check altogether to make it
consistent.

Removal of this check isn't fatal to this driver.

Signed-off-by: Prashant Bhole <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c
index eb8c679fca9f..6d4b35f26ae5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c

@@ -469,8 +469,6 @@ static int __init nsim_module_init(void)
 	int err;
 
 	nsim_ddir = debugfs_create_dir(DRV_NAME, NULL);
-	if (IS_ERR(nsim_ddir))
-		return PTR_ERR(nsim_ddir);
 
 	err = bus_register(&nsim_bus);
 	if (err)

-- 
2.13.6

On Fri,  8 Dec 2017 11:14:56 +0900, Prashant Bhole wrote:

Initial discussion started about correct handling of this condition.
Later it was decided to remove this check altogether to make it
consistent.

Removal of this check isn't fatal to this driver.

Signed-off-by: Prashant Bhole <redacted>

Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <redacted>

but as I mentioned there is another, similar check in netdevsim/bpf.c:
"... drop this error handling here and in nsim_bpf_create_prog()."

From: Prashant Bhole <redacted>
Date: Fri,  8 Dec 2017 11:14:56 +0900

Initial discussion started about correct handling of this condition.
Later it was decided to remove this check altogether to make it
consistent.

Removal of this check isn't fatal to this driver.

...

Please stop this madness.

You cannot continue if this thing returns NULL.

WHY?

Because later if you pass NULL to debugfs_create_dir() in nsim_init() do
you have any idea what it is going to do?

It's going to put the netdevsim device files into the root!

Please:

1) Handle the errors

2) Make them fatal, if DEBUGFS is enabled this should never fail except
   for memory allocation failures and we have bigger problems than
   successfully loading the netdevsim driver

3) Fix debugfs_create_dir() to have sane return value semantics so that
   people do not have to check both NULL and error pointers

Thank you.