Thread (9 messages) flat view 9 messages, 2 authors, 2017-11-15

Re: [PATCH][v3] uprobes/x86: emulate push insns for uprobe on x86

From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Date: 2017-11-14 15:51:34
Also in: lkml

On 11/13, Yonghong Song wrote:
+static int push_setup_xol_ops(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
+{
+	u8 opc1 = OPCODE1(insn), reg_offset = 0;
+
+	if (opc1 < 0x50 || opc1 > 0x57)
+		return -ENOSYS;
+
+	if (insn->length > 2)
+		return -ENOSYS;
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_ADDR32))
+		return -ENOSYS;
+#endif
No, this doesn't look right, see my previous email. You should do this
check in the "if (insn->length == 2)" branch below, "push bp" should be
emulated correctly.

And test_thread_flag(TIF_ADDR32) is not right too. The caller is not
necessarily the probed task. See is_64bit_mm(mm) in arch_uprobe_analyze_insn().

And again... please check if uprobe_init_insn() fails or not in this case
(32bit task does, say, "push r8"). If it fails, your V2 should be fine.


To remind, uprobes && 32-bit is broken, let me quote my another email:

	The 3rd bug means that you simply can't uprobe a 32bit task on a 64bit
	system, the in_compat_syscall() logic in get_unmapped_area() looks very
	wrong although I need to re-check.

I didn't have time for this problem so far. But emulation should work, so
you can hopefully test your patch.

Oleg.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help