Re: [PATCH resend 2/2] userns: control capabilities of some user namespaces
From: Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-10 01:50:23
Also in:
linux-api, lkml
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Serge E. Hallyn [off-list ref] wrote:
Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (mahesh@bandewar.net):quoted
From: Mahesh Bandewar <redacted> With this new notion of "controlled" user-namespaces, the controlled user-namespaces are marked at the time of their creation while the capabilities of processes that belong to them are controlled using the global mask. Init-user-ns is always uncontrolled and a process that has SYS_ADMIN that belongs to uncontrolled user-ns can create another (child) user- namespace that is uncontrolled. Any other process (that either does not have SYS_ADMIN or belongs to a controlled user-ns) can only create a user-ns that is controlled. global-capability-whitelist (controlled_userns_caps_whitelist) is used at the capability check-time and keeps the semantics for the processes that belong to uncontrolled user-ns as it is. Processes that belong to controlled user-ns however are subjected to different checks- (a) if the capability in question is controlled and process belongs to controlled user-ns, then it's always denied. (b) if the capability in question is NOT controlled then fall back to the traditional check. Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar <redacted> --- include/linux/capability.h | 1 + include/linux/user_namespace.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/capability.c | 5 +++++ kernel/user_namespace.c | 3 +++ security/commoncap.c | 8 ++++++++ 5 files changed, 37 insertions(+)diff --git a/include/linux/capability.h b/include/linux/capability.h index 6c0b9677c03f..b8c6cac18658 100644 --- a/include/linux/capability.h +++ b/include/linux/capability.h@@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ extern bool ptracer_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, struct user_namespace *ns); extern int get_vfs_caps_from_disk(const struct dentry *dentry, struct cpu_vfs_cap_data *cpu_caps); int proc_douserns_caps_whitelist(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void __user *buff, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos); +bool is_capability_controlled(int cap); extern int cap_convert_nscap(struct dentry *dentry, void **ivalue, size_t size);diff --git a/include/linux/user_namespace.h b/include/linux/user_namespace.h index c18e01252346..e890fe81b47e 100644 --- a/include/linux/user_namespace.h +++ b/include/linux/user_namespace.h@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct uid_gid_map { /* 64 bytes -- 1 cache line */ }; #define USERNS_SETGROUPS_ALLOWED 1UL +#define USERNS_CONTROLLED 2UL #define USERNS_INIT_FLAGS USERNS_SETGROUPS_ALLOWED@@ -102,6 +103,16 @@ static inline void put_user_ns(struct user_namespace *ns) __put_user_ns(ns); } +static inline bool is_user_ns_controlled(const struct user_namespace *ns) +{ + return ns->flags & USERNS_CONTROLLED; +} + +static inline void mark_user_ns_controlled(struct user_namespace *ns) +{ + ns->flags |= USERNS_CONTROLLED; +} + struct seq_operations; extern const struct seq_operations proc_uid_seq_operations; extern const struct seq_operations proc_gid_seq_operations;@@ -160,6 +171,15 @@ static inline struct ns_common *ns_get_owner(struct ns_common *ns) { return ERR_PTR(-EPERM); } + +static inline bool is_user_ns_controlled(const struct user_namespace *ns) +{ + return false; +} + +static inline void mark_user_ns_controlled(struct user_namespace *ns) +{ +} #endif #endif /* _LINUX_USER_H */diff --git a/kernel/capability.c b/kernel/capability.c index 62dbe3350c1b..40a38cc4ff43 100644 --- a/kernel/capability.c +++ b/kernel/capability.c@@ -510,6 +510,11 @@ bool ptracer_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, struct user_namespace *ns) } /* Controlled-userns capabilities routines */ +bool is_capability_controlled(int cap) +{ + return !cap_raised(controlled_userns_caps_whitelist, cap); +} + #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL int proc_douserns_caps_whitelist(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void __user *buff, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)diff --git a/kernel/user_namespace.c b/kernel/user_namespace.c index c490f1e4313b..f393ea5108f0 100644 --- a/kernel/user_namespace.c +++ b/kernel/user_namespace.c@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ static void set_cred_user_ns(struct cred *cred, struct user_namespace *user_ns) cred->cap_effective = CAP_FULL_SET; cred->cap_ambient = CAP_EMPTY_SET; cred->cap_bset = CAP_FULL_SET; + if (!ns_capable(user_ns->parent, CAP_SYS_ADMIN) || + is_user_ns_controlled(user_ns->parent)) + mark_user_ns_controlled(user_ns);Hm, why do this here, rather than at create_user_ns()? It shouldn't be recalculated when someone does setns() should it?
You are absolutely right! It doesn't make sense to recalculate for every setns() call. It's a side effect of couple of iterations / approaches that I tried before finalizing this one. I'll move this block to create_user_ns() after the set_cred_user_ns() call so that this wont be triggered in setns() path. Thanks, --mahesh..