Re: FW: [PATCH 24/31] nds32: Miscellaneous header files
From: Vincent Chen <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-09 10:42:04
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
quoted
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 6:55 AM, Greentime Hu [off-list ref] wrote: + +static inline void __delay(unsigned long loops) { + __asm__ __volatile__(".align 2\n" + "1:\n" + "\taddi\t%0, %0, -1\n" + "\tbgtz\t%0, 1b\n" + :"=r"(loops) + :"0"(loops)); }Does the architecture define a high-resolution clock source? If yes, then it's better to use that to get exact timing than to rely on the loop calibration.
Dear Arnd: Thanks. I will modify it in the next version patch.
quoted
+/* + * This file is generally used by user-level software, so you need to + * be a little careful about namespace pollution etc. Also, we +cannot + * assume GCC is being used. + */ + +typedef unsigned short __kernel_mode_t; #define __kernel_mode_t +__kernel_mode_t + +typedef unsigned short __kernel_ipc_pid_t; #define __kernel_ipc_pid_t +__kernel_ipc_pid_t + +typedef unsigned short __kernel_uid_t; typedef unsigned short +__kernel_gid_t; #define __kernel_uid_t __kernel_uid_t + +typedef unsigned short __kernel_old_dev_t; #define __kernel_old_dev_t +__kernel_old_dev_t + +#include <asm-generic/posix_types.h>I don't understand why you would want to override any of those. Changing them unfortunately means rebuilding all of your user space, but I think it would be better to do that now than to suffer from this later on. Arnd
Thanks. I will remove them in the next version patch. Best regards Vincent