Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2017-11-06

Re: [PATCH net-next v15] openvswitch: enable NSH support

From: Jiri Benc <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-06 12:22:48

On Sat, 4 Nov 2017 07:29:46 -0700, Pravin Shelar wrote:
quoted
+int nsh_push(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nshhdr *pushed_nh)
+{
+       struct nshhdr *nh;
+       size_t length = nsh_hdr_len(pushed_nh);
+       u8 next_proto;
+
+       if (skb->mac_len) {
+               next_proto = TUN_P_ETHERNET;
+       } else {
+               next_proto = tun_p_from_eth_p(skb->protocol);
+               if (!next_proto)
+                       return -EAFNOSUPPORT;  
check for supported protocols can be moved to flow install validation
in __ovs_nla_copy_actions().
You mean the check for !next_proto? It needs to be present for
correctness of nsh_push. This function has to be self contained, it
will be used by more callers than opevswitch, namely tc.

It's actually not so much a check for "supported protocols", it's
rather a check of return value of a function that converts ethertype to
a 1 byte tunnel type. Blindly using a result of a function that may
return error would be wrong. Openvswitch is free to perform additional
checks but this needs to stay.
quoted
+int nsh_pop(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+       struct nshhdr *nh;
+       size_t length;
+       __be16 inner_proto;
+
+       if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, NSH_BASE_HDR_LEN))
+               return -ENOMEM;
+       nh = (struct nshhdr *)(skb->data);
+       length = nsh_hdr_len(nh);
+       inner_proto = tun_p_to_eth_p(nh->np);  
same as above, this check can be moved to flow install __ovs_nla_copy_actions().
There's no check here.
quoted
+       if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, length))
+               return -ENOMEM;
+
+       if (!inner_proto)
+               return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
Did you mean this one instead? Then see above, this has to stay.

 Jiri
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help