Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 2 authors, 2017-11-04

Re: [PATCH] sr9800: Use common error handling code in sr9800_phy_powerup()

From: SF Markus Elfring <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-29 12:04:07
Also in: kernel-janitors, lkml

quoted
@@ -700,10 +700,9 @@ static int sr9800_phy_powerup(struct usbnet *dev)

        /* set the embedded Ethernet PHY in power-up state */
        ret = sr_sw_reset(dev, SR_SWRESET_IPRL);
-       if (ret < 0) {
-               netdev_err(dev->net, "Failed to reset PHY: %d\n", ret);
-               return ret;
-       }
+       if (ret < 0)
+               goto report_reset_failure;
So now I have to look below to see what error handling it does...
Yes. - Can this be an usual consequence if you apply information from
the section “7) Centralized exiting of functions” in the document
“coding-style.rst” a bit more?


Hence I prefer the original version, which had _less_ lines of code...
My update suggestion is only one line “bigger” in this case, isn't it?

I propose an other source code layout so that a bit smaller executable
object code could be achieved.
Do find such a software design direction feasible?

Regards,
Markus
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help