Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 7 authors, 2017-11-14

Re: [PATCH 00/18] use ARRAY_SIZE macro

From: J. Bruce Fields <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-02 19:22:28
Also in: alsa-devel, amd-gfx, dm-devel, dri-devel, intel-gfx, intel-wired-lan, linux-acpi, linux-integrity, linux-media, linux-nfs, linux-raid, linux-rdma, linux-scsi, linux-wireless, lkml, nouveau

On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 07:35:54AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 08:52:20PM -0400, Jérémy Lefaure wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 09:01:31 +1100
"Tobin C. Harding" [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
In order to reduce the size of the To: and Cc: lines, each patch of the
series is sent only to the maintainers and lists concerned by the patch.
This cover letter is sent to every list concerned by this series.  
Why don't you just send individual patches for each subsystem? I'm not a maintainer but I don't see
how any one person is going to be able to apply this whole series, it is making it hard for
maintainers if they have to pick patches out from among the series (if indeed any will bother
doing that).
Yeah, maybe it would have been better to send individual patches.

From my point of view it's a series because the patches are related (I
did a git format-patch from my local branch). But for the maintainers
point of view, they are individual patches.
And the maintainers view is what matters here, if you wish to get your
patches reviewed and accepted...
Mainly I'd just like to know which you're asking for.  Do you want me to
apply this, or to ACK it so someone else can?  If it's sent as a series
I tend to assume the latter.

But in this case I'm assuming it's the former, so I'll pick up the nfsd
one....

--b.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help