Thread (8 messages) flat view 8 messages, 5 authors, 2017-10-10

Re: [PATCH net-next] openvswitch: add ct_clear action

From: Pravin Shelar <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-10 04:41:56

On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Eric Garver [off-list ref] wrote:
This adds a ct_clear action for clearing conntrack state. ct_clear is
currently implemented in OVS userspace, but is not backed by an action
in the kernel datapath. This is useful for flows that may modify a
packet tuple after a ct lookup has already occurred.

Signed-off-by: Eric Garver <redacted>
Patch mostly looks good. I have following comments.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
 include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h |  2 ++
 net/openvswitch/actions.c        |  5 +++++
 net/openvswitch/conntrack.c      | 12 ++++++++++++
 net/openvswitch/conntrack.h      |  7 +++++++
 net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c   |  5 +++++
 5 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h b/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h
index 156ee4cab82e..1b6e510e2cc6 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h
@@ -806,6 +806,7 @@ struct ovs_action_push_eth {
  * packet.
  * @OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_ETH: Pop the outermost Ethernet header off the
  * packet.
+ * @OVS_ACTION_ATTR_CT_CLEAR: Clear conntrack state from the packet.
  *
  * Only a single header can be set with a single %OVS_ACTION_ATTR_SET.  Not all
  * fields within a header are modifiable, e.g. the IPv4 protocol and fragment
@@ -835,6 +836,7 @@ enum ovs_action_attr {
        OVS_ACTION_ATTR_TRUNC,        /* u32 struct ovs_action_trunc. */
        OVS_ACTION_ATTR_PUSH_ETH,     /* struct ovs_action_push_eth. */
        OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_ETH,      /* No argument. */
+       OVS_ACTION_ATTR_CT_CLEAR,     /* No argument. */

        __OVS_ACTION_ATTR_MAX,        /* Nothing past this will be accepted
                                       * from userspace. */
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/actions.c b/net/openvswitch/actions.c
index a54a556fcdb5..db9c7f2e662b 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/actions.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/actions.c
@@ -1203,6 +1203,10 @@ static int do_execute_actions(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb,
                                return err == -EINPROGRESS ? 0 : err;
                        break;

+               case OVS_ACTION_ATTR_CT_CLEAR:
+                       err = ovs_ct_clear(skb, key);
+                       break;
+
                case OVS_ACTION_ATTR_PUSH_ETH:
                        err = push_eth(skb, key, nla_data(a));
                        break;
@@ -1210,6 +1214,7 @@ static int do_execute_actions(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb,
                case OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_ETH:
                        err = pop_eth(skb, key);
                        break;
+
                }
Unrelated change.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
                if (unlikely(err)) {
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
index d558e882ca0c..f9b73c726ad7 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
@@ -1129,6 +1129,18 @@ int ovs_ct_execute(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
        return err;
 }

+int ovs_ct_clear(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sw_flow_key *key)
+{
+       if (skb_nfct(skb)) {
+               nf_conntrack_put(skb_nfct(skb));
+               nf_ct_set(skb, NULL, 0);
Can the new conntract state be appropriate? may be IP_CT_UNTRACKED?
+       }
+
+       ovs_ct_fill_key(skb, key);
+
I do not see need to refill the key if there is no skb-nf-ct.
+       return 0;
+}
+
 static int ovs_ct_add_helper(struct ovs_conntrack_info *info, const char *name,
                             const struct sw_flow_key *key, bool log)
 {
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help